SANTA CRUZ WAVES PRESENTS: January 2014 Radiation Report

SANTA CRUZ WAVES PRESENTS: January 2014 Radiation Report from Santa Cruz Waves on Vimeo.

The point of this video is not to mislead people with false information or say there is nothing to be concerned about. We care deeply about our environment and this wonderful community and wanted to shine light on this serious issue. We hadn’t heard any news or information coming from this area so we decided to take it into our own hands with the equipment available at the time. We’re not claiming to be scientists we simply wanted to bring awareness and open up the conversation. In our follow up video next month we will try and find experts to help us with our investigation.


TF

About TF

Photographer specializing in action and nature.



60 comments on “SANTA CRUZ WAVES PRESENTS: January 2014 Radiation Report


  1. Since I’m a kitesurfer I’m really curious to see what it is at Waddell – especially when it’s windy.

  2. Thanks a lot for taking these readings and sharing the data. I hope you get a good storm swell for next month’s readings!

  3. Seriously?
    Although I commend you on such a diligent effort in reporting, you cannot expect PROFESSIONAL results from a toy that costs roughly $150 (you got taken because the kit is $35) off of ebay, right?
    Scientists <—- from the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute used scientific equipment and measures that must be performed in a series of regulated stringent proceedure(s, required for ACCURATE readings to be even acceptable for conjecture. This requires pre-existing data to be obtained and verified BEFORE sterile enviroments are created, as so no contamination could possibly affect any documented and cataloged samples can be accepted into a lab for thorough and complete analysis.
    A dude walking around with his toy that is uncalibrated by any accredited institution is far from acceptable, yet can only be believed as a fun and amateuristic attempt at best. Although you may be satisfied with erroneous readings (do you judge the wind speed with your wet finger or anemometer), what was truly disturbing..
    commentaries from those interviewed. A surfer that WOULD continue to surf even if the area was posted with warnings not to do so, a fisherman that gives contaminated catch to others, and you happily condoning both… FAIL!
    Is it not our duty as human beings to protect one another at any measure, and not allow them into CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER!?

  4. Cool. Hope it’s true. Same counter. Quality one? More info please.

  5. Thanks for the info. Just a quick word about Vimeo. I know it looks better than YouTube, but for other than hi-speed server areas, it’s way slow to load and streams erratically.

  6. Thank you for monitoring and sharing. Do you have a device to check the sea water? It would be great to have other organizations like minded as your to report what’s going on in other sea towns up down the pacific northwest.

  7. Your Geiger counter is not the correct instrument to detect the major hazard from Fukushima, which is radioactive micro-particles, in particular plutonium micro-particles. The alpha particles emitted by plutonium will not penetrate your skin or be detected by your meter. The hazard arises from breathing or ingesting these very small particles, which then irradiate lung tissue or the lining of your digestive tract or even transfer into the blood stream, eventually inducing cancers. However plutonium is also incredibly toxic, and a very small particle can be fatal when introduced into your blood stream. We are being heavily impacted by these, particularly when concentrated in fog or rain. The fact is that you aren’t going to detect these except by their effects on our bodies. Running around with a consumer grade Geiger counter just contributes to the cover-up. You can ignore or be unaware of reality, but you won’t be able to ignore the effects of this reality.

  8. You’re just air testing. What about testing the water? Surfers will be exposed to both.

  9. Great work! Much appreciated. Would love to see you guys do this weekly. There are a lot of good resources out there on how to protect yourself from radiation: Modifalin(seaweed) and Nascent Iodine to name a few. If the levels are high, getting in the ocean to carve waves is risky, especially with the mist created when the surf is pumping. Best!

  10. Thanx for the update Tyler… Hope to see you at Mav’s soon 😉

  11. I agree with rawenniyo akweks here, that this device is not acceptable for proper testing.

    I also wanted to point out that aside from being a low grade test unit the device Tyler is using is designed to test radiation free floating in the AIR. The air moves around the globe quite fast so small clouds carrying radiation can pass through rather quickly with the weather that may not be evident at the moment. This is why the monitoring stations run non stop so we can compare readings throughout the day. The more readings you take, say 25, the more accurate will be your average background radiation level. Take the average of your CPM readings. The highest and lowest CPM count will establish your minimum and maximum CPM. These numbers will establish a baseline so that you will be able to determine if the background radiation has changed, or to detect trace amounts of radioactive materials.

    The pollution we should be more worried about is in the water murdering the ecosystem of the Monterey Bay.

    NOBODY WORRIES BECAUSE IT IS AN INVISIBLE THREAT!!!

    If is was visibly identifiable like the BP Oil Spill then it would have been addressed properly!

    Out of sight out of mind I guess…

    If the kelp beds have been tested to contain as much as 400 times the amount of radiation than before the Fukushima melt down then we should be alarmed.

    Remember You Can’t See Or Taste This Stuff Folks but it is readily absorbed through just about everything. It can be absorbed from air through your skin as well as ingesting by air, liquid or food stuff.

    So while you bath in the sea waiting for that next set or chowing down that rock cod or crab you could be ingesting as much as the federal occupational limit for human absorbtion of radiation in one sitting…

    The federal occupational limit per year is 5,000 millirems per adult

    Roughly the U.S average at sea level is approx. 300 millerems per year before Fukushima

    To approximately calculate your daily radiation dose you would multiply Tyler’s reading if it was acceptable of 20 cpm times 60mins. and then times 24hrs 20x60x24 = 28800 cp/day. Approximately 1000 counts would equal 1 mrem depending upon which radiactive material you are being exposed to.

    So every day you would be exposed to approximately 28 mrems which is fairly safe but it gets unsafe if you would be exposed to this level for a long period of time. If you stay indoors the exposure level will decrease dramatically. The question is how long you will you constantly be exposed to the 20 cpm of radiation.

    At 20cpm converted to mrems or millirems of 28 mrems/day that is an average of 10080 mrems/year

    as I wrote above the Current level of exposure is not to exceed 5,000 millirems per year

    Ways to limit radiation exposure:
    1. Time (limit exposure time)
    2. Distance (intensity decreases sharply according to the inverse-square-law)
    3. Shielding
    (alpha: nearly anything… a sheet of paper will stop it – danger of breathing it)
    (beta: wood, water, plastic-acrylic, aluminum)
    (gamma: water, concrete, lead)

  12. Would like to see a reading off of fish that are caught. Though I agree with the post about the amateur nature of this testing, I applaud the attempt you are making to see for yourself what comes up in the ambient air readings. My concern is higher for those beings that live in the ocean.

  13. Thanx for tha Rad. Report,
    You mentioned readings up north were hi
    And was wondering “how north?”I’m Sonoma county
    Material so was it way flipping north or am I phucked? waves been okay
    But not worth loosing my midleg over??im kinda fuka concerned
    But more in the dark-gotta get a gigs counter I gues.again thanks,

  14. radiation is heavy, dont you think you should have conducted a more thourgh test ie: ocean floor sample , fish samples, vegitaion sample, looks like you where jsut testing the air, maybe im wrong and your equipment is all that

  15. Whom would you rather beleive, the County Officials in Half Moon Bay providing their results after conducting LICENSED scientific experiment(s and providing CREDIBLE result(s, or just some dude walking around with a toy and questioning the numb? (NaturalNews) Radiation from Fukushima has reached the shores of California. This has been confirmed by county officials in Half Moon Bay, California, who conducted radiation tests and found a 500% increase in radiation on the beaches there.

    Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/043409_Fukushima_Cesium-137

  16. Most of our water along the coast is upwelled from depth. It will be thousands of years before any of the water that was directly exposed to the water at the fukushima plant. You should be worrying about the lack of rainfall more than the radiation.

  17. when the fisherman says giving them away he means letting the fish back in the ocean

  18. Thanks. We need scientific data taken with world class instruments.
    UCSC must have such equipment and possibly already has some very recent/ current data.
    Contact them and post.
    This is a very real and present danger.
    We need to tell people. The news black out on this total in mainstream media.

  19. Awesome initiative Tyler. For those that are knocking the test: please get out there with better equipment or methods record it and share. I am sure Tyler would appreciate the help also.

  20. bogus meter u have there, get a real one, there was a man who took readings from east coast to Org, and CPMs were in the hundreds,

  21. I think the bigger issue is whether there is excessive radiation contamination in the water. While I am glad you are doing “citizen science”, perhaps you can also find a counter that measures the radiation levels in the water itself. Thanks.

  22. I I agree with your comment that we should test kelp and other sea life. I have created the organization “Citizen Scientists 4 Truth” and our first goal is to measure radiation in food correctly with consumer geiger counters. Please check out my Youtube Channel.

  23. First of all, I appreciate that you care enough to look into this. You seem like a concerned and good guy.
    Secondly, that leak in Japan is very serious from all the research I have done. Now I don’t know about the meter reader at all, I know a man did one in San Mateo and it was very high- the radiation numbers. EVERYONE, should care enough as you do to at least try to check it out. I have been advised by a genius doctor to be very concerned about the radiation, and DO NOT EAT FISH from the PACIFIC OCEAN. Those reactors are pouring radiation into our ocean every day. And let me say, that if another earthquake hits Japan and those reactors get nailed, we are in deep sh*&.
    People should be up in arms with Tepco and Japan! Our media is trying to hide it. Not good.
    So, do another reading in a few months if you can. And if you see my nephew Miles S. surfing, tell him I said to get his butt out of the ocean! Thanks very much for caring 😉
    Teresa

  24. As a reader here, I think you should be less harsh. This guy cares enough to go out there, and hey, it’s more than most people are doing. The facts are that the leak Is VERRRRRY serious. Read all articles, even from Japan and translate and you will see how bad it is. If another earthquake hits Japan and those reactors….well, we are in trouble.
    Ask our media why they aren’t all over this…..Oh I mean ask our gov. why they are trying to hide it.
    Be aware and I commend this kid for trying at the very least.
    Teresa

  25. Is everyone aware what to be ingesting right now to help your bodies? Look into it. There are a lot of natural things to take to help our bodies fight this radiation which indeed, is very bad. We are in trouble with this radiation in a big way.

  26. The West Coast -that is you of course and you need to take things to protect your body now. This is going to get worse before it gets better. Start reading about what to ingest to help your body. It is crucial.

  27. Don’t pay the Devil’s contracts and here there tactics

    SFPD Ruthlessly Shoots and Kills Unarmed 16yr old boy over $2 Bus Fare

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2u7jEbM42c

    Do you really wonder why Your Elected and public employees who our your servants government employees doesn’t like to consider “We THE People” as sovereign? Because The Corporation claim you our not responsible. Are you
    Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition
    Attorney General…
    “He is the chief law officer of the federal and state governments with the duty of representing the sovereign, national or state. Johnson v. Commonwealth, ex rel. Meredith, 291 Ky. 829, 165 S.W.2d 820, 826.”
    https://www.facebook.com/events/565416906872114/

    Any ticket or trouble requiring a driver’s license es unconstitutional
    (including expired plates, etc.)
    “The right to travel is a well-established common right that does not owe its existence to the federal government. It is recognized by the courts as a natural right.” Schactman v. Dulles 96 App DC 287, 225 F2d 938, at 941.
    “The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime.” Miller v. US, 230 F 486, at 489.
    http://www.land.netonecom.net/tlp/ref/right2travel.shtml

    SUPREME COURT RULING: Police Have No Duty To Protect The General Public
    http://gunssavelives.net/…/supreme-court-ruling-police…/
    “Personal liberty, or the Right to enjoyment of life and liberty, is one of the fundamental or natural Rights, which has been protected by its inclusion as a guarantee in the various constitutions, which is not derived from, or
    dependent on, the U.S. Constitution, which may not be submitted to a vote and may not depend on the outcome of an election. It is one of the most sacred and valuable Rights, as sacred as the Right to private property…and is regarded as UNALIENABLE.” 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, Sect.202, p.987.
    It is not the duty of the police to protect you. Their job is to protect the Corporation and arrest code breakers.” (Sapp v. Tallahasee, 348 So. 2nd. 363, Reiff v. City of Philadelphia 477 F.Supp. 1262, Lynch v. N.C. Dept of Justice 376 S. E. 2nd. 247.) Palazzolo v. Rhode Island | The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent … http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2000/2000_99_2047/ Feb 26, 2001 – Anthony
    EnforcementNotAllowed.htm – Cached ConspiracyWatch> ENFORCEMENT OF CITY/COUNTY CODES PROHIBITED ConspiracyWatch> ENFORCEMENT OF CITY/COUNTY CODES PROHIBITED Jack Bauer bowersecret at gmail.com Thu Jul 1 10:22:56 CDT 2010. Previous message: ConspiracyWatch> Kagan … constitutionalgov.us/pipermail/

    If you are concerned about your Freedoms,

    The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and the name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.”16th American Jurisprudence 2d, Section 177, late 2nd, Section 256,,,,,,,,Personal liberty, or the Right to enjoyment of life and liberty, is one of the fundamental or natural Rights, which has been protected by its inclusion as a guarantee in the various constitutions, which is not derived from, or dependent on, the U.S. Constitution, which may not be submitted to a vote and may not depend on the outcome of an election. It is one of the most sacred and valuable Rights, as sacred as the Right to private property…and is regarded as UNALIENABLE.” 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, Sect.202, p.987.
    Lawful,,Due proses is Constitutional the private American side 1866 civil rights act to protect lawful americans from there Elected and public Employees,,Judicial proses Fraud and treasonous Fraud appone the Court, Constitutional lawfulness court proceeding of a jury of 12, jury nullification,,,, Judicial proses Democracy Courts is the defato of 1871,

    Public Notice. *The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18
    U.S.C. 119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this
    “Message,” including attachments. The originator intended this Message for
    the specified recipients only; it may contain the originator’s confidential
    and proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies unintended
    recipients that they have received this Message in error, and strictly
    proscribes their Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
    actions. Recipients-in-error shall notify the originator immediately by
    e-mail, and delete the original message. Authorized carriers of this message
    shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
    v. Arch. Anything stated in this email may be limited in the content and is
    not to be taken out of context.**Wireless Copyright Notice**. Federal and
    State laws govern copyrights to this Message. You must have the
    originator’s full written consent to alter, copy, or use this Message.
    Originator acknowledges others’ copyrighted content in this Message.
    Otherwise, Copyright © 2011 by originator**. All Rights Reserved.

    Without Prejudice All Rights Reserved UCC1-308
    Sovereign Confidentiality Notice:
    I am not an attorney, medical professional or financial adviser and all the exchanges contained in this email are for personal use only. This private email message, including any attachment[s] is limited to the sole use of the intended recipient[s] and may contain Privileged and/or Confidential Information. Any and All Political, Private or Public Entities, Federal, State, or Local Corporate Government[s] , et. al.,and/or Third Party[ies] working in collusion by collecting and/or monitoring My email[s] and collecting these communications Without my Exclusive Permission are Barred from Any and All Unauthorized Review,Use, Disclosure or Distribution. With Explicit Reservation of All My Rights, Without Prejudice and Without Recourse to Me, Any omission does not constitute a waiver of any and/or ALL Intellectual Property Rights & Reserved Rights. It is my hope that the things within this email are a blessing unto every reader without exception, for I desire peaceful co-existence with ALL! dential
    and proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies unintended
    recipients that they have received this Message in error, and strictly
    proscribes their Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
    actions. Recipients-in-error shall notify the originator immediately by
    e-mail, and delete the original message. Authorized carriers of this message
    shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
    v. Arch. Anything stated in this email may be limited in the content and is
    not to be taken out of context.**Wireless Copyright Notice**. Federal and
    State laws govern copyrights to this Message. You must have the
    originator’s full written consent to alter, copy, or use this Message.
    Originator acknowledges others’ copyrighted content in this Message.
    Otherwise, Copyright © 2011 by originator**. All Rights Reserved.

  28. ww.scribd.com/doc/194601994/Hiding-Behind-the-BAR-Why-Attorneys-Are-Not-Lawyers-Public-Notice

    Hiding Behind the BAR Why Attorneys Are Not Lawyers Public Notice

    Ratings: (1)|Views: 553|Likes: 0
    Published by in1or
    Hiding Behind The BAR Why Attorneys Are Not Lawyers Public Notice

    “Within the U.S. Corporation,” they’re collectively called everything from “attorney” to “lawyer” to “counselor.” Are these terms truly equivalent, or has the identity of one been mistaken for another…
    See More

    Feudal Tenancy
    /& you thin* you are a landowner in A’erica” ta*e a close loo* at the warranty deed or &ee title to your land. Jou will al’ost always &ind the words (tenant( or (tenancy.( The title or deed docu’ent establishing your right as a tenant” not that o& a landowner” has been !re!ared &or trans&er by a licensed BAR Attorney” 3ust as it was carried out within the original nglish &eudal syste’ we “belie%ed# we had esca!ed &ro’ in 8KKE. A hu’an being is the tenant to a &eudal su!erior. A &eudal tenant is a “legal !erson# 5thing6 who !ays rent or ser%ices o& so’e sort &or the use and occu!ation o& another$s land. The land has been con%eyed to the tenant$s use” but the actual ownershi! re’ains with the su!erior. /& a co”on “Peo!le# does not own what he thought was his land 5he$s legally de&ined as a (&eudal tenant”( not the su!erior owner6″ then a su!erior “!erson# owns the land and the &eudal tenant  “!erson# !ays hi’ to occu!y the land. This is the hidden N# &or your role in the BAR Attorney syste’ as a <eudal Tenant.
    &ritish Accredited 'egistry (&A')%
    7uring the 'iddle 8EMM$s" the rown o& ngland established a &or'al registry in London where barristers were ordered by the rown to be accredited. The establish'ent o& this &irst /nternational Bar Association allowed barrister-lawyers &ro' all nations to be &or'ally recogniCed and accredited by the only recogniCed accreditation society. <ro' this" the acrony' BAR was established denoting 5in&or'ally6 the British Accredited Registry" whose 'e'bers beca'e a !ower&ul and integral &orce within the /nternational Bar Association 5/BA6. Although this has been denied re!eatedly as to its e,istence" the acrony' BAR stood &or the British barrister-lawyers who were 'e'bers o& the larger /BA. When A'erica was still a chartered grou! o& British colonies under !atent – established in what was &or'ally na'ed the British rown Territory o& New ngland – the &irst British Accredited Registry 5BAR6 was established in Boston during 8KE8 to atte'!t to allow only accredited barrister-lawyers access to the British courts o& New ngland. This was the &irst atte'!t to control who could re!resent de&endants in the court at or within the bar in A'erica. Today" each cor!orate “STAT# in A'erica has it$s own BAR Association" i.e. The T lawyers. /n reality” the U.S. courts only allow their o&&icer attorneys to &reely enter within the bar while !rohibiting those learned o& the law – lawyers – to do so. They !re%ent ad%ocates” lawyers” counselors” barristers and solicitors &ro’ entering through the outer bar. >nly licensed BAR Attorneys are !er’itted to &reely enter within the bar se!arating the !eo!le &ro’ the bench because all BAR Attorneys are o&&icers o& the court itsel&. 7oes that tell you anything+
    3

    Here$s where the whole word ga’e gets really tric*y. /n each “STAT”# e%ery licensed BAR Attorney calls hi’sel& an Attorney at Law. Loo* at the de&initions abo%e and see &or yoursel& that an Attorney at Law is nothing ‘ore than an attorney – one who trans&ers allegiance and !ro!erty to the ruling landowner. Another na’e ga’e they use is (o& counsel”( which ‘eans absolutely nothing ‘ore than an o&&er o& ad%ice. Surely” the ‘echanic down the street can do that Ad%ice is one thing4 law&ul re!resentation is another. A BAR licensed Attorney is not an ad%ocate” so how can he do anything other than what his real !ur!ose is+ He can$t !lead on your behal& because that would be a con&lict o& interest. He can$t re!resent the crown 5ruling go%ern’ent6 as an o&&icial o&&icer at the sa’e ti’e he is allegedly re!resenting a de&endant. His sworn duty as a BAR Attorney is to trans&er your ownershi!” rights” titles” and allegiance to the landowner. When you hire a BAR Attorney to re!resent you in their courts” you ha%e hired an o&&icer o& that court whose sole !ur!ose and occu!ation is to trans&er what you ha%e to the creator and authority o& that court. A ‘ore a!!ro!riate !hrase would be “legal !lunder.# See (The Law( by rigin rig. 5now Hist.6″ a young noble’an who” in training &or *nighthood” acted as shield-bearer and attendant to a *night. Later” a ‘an belonging to the higher order o& nglish gentry” ran*ing ne,t below a *night. l’e. b. Hist. Any o& %arious o&&icers in the ser%ice o& a *ing or noble’an. c. A landed !ro!rietor” a country s)uire. arch. – >,&ord nglish 7ictionary 8:::.7uring the nglish &eudal laws o& land ownershi! and tenancy” a s)uire – es)uire- was established as the land !ro!rietor charged with the duty o& carrying out” a’ong %arious other duties” the act o& attorn’ent Fsee de&inition abo%eG &or the landowner and noble’an he ser%ed. ould this be any si’!ler &or the a%erage A’erican to o%er-stand+ /& our current U.S. BAR Attorneys were 3ust lawyers” solicitors” barristers” ad%ocates or counselors” then they would call the’sel%es the sa’e. They ha%e na’ed the’sel%es 3ust e,actly what they are” yet we blindly cannot see the writing on the wall+ The BAR Attorneys ha%e not hidden this &ro’ anyone. That$s why they deliberately call the’sel%es (s)uires( and (Attorneys at law.( /t is the A’erican !eo!le who ha%e hidden their own heads in the sand+ nowing these si’!le truths” why would anyone consider the ser%ices o& BAR Attorney-s)uire as his re!resentati%e within the ruling courts o& A’erica+ Their !ur!oses” !osition” occu!ation” 3ob” and duty is to trans&er your allegiance” !ro!erty” and rights to the landowner” a.*.a. STAT. FSee >ur ne’y” The State by Albert D. Noc*” 8:;” His lassic riti)ue 7istinguishing $o%ern’ent$ &ro’ the $State$G They are sworn oath o&&icers o& the “STAT# whose sole authority is to trans&er your !ro!erty to their landowner-e’!loyer. Thin* about this the ne,t ti’e you enter their courtroo’s. <ro' now on" all A'ericans should re&use to enter !ast the outer bar when the “!erson"# “na'e# is called. Who would %oluntarily want to relin)uish all he has by !assing into their “legal tra!# that e,ists inside that outer bar+ We 'ust all re&use to recogniCe their royal !osition as S)uires and re&use to hire the' as our re!resentati%es and agents. They can$t !lead or argue &or you anyway4 all they can do is o%ersee the act o& attorn'ent on behal& o& the ruling cor!oration who' they ser%e as o&&icial o&&icers. Nothing sto!s your neighbor &ro' being a barrister or lawyer. No real law !rohibits any o& us &ro' being lawyers %en Abraha' Lincoln was a well-recogniCed lawyer" yet he had no &or'al law degree. Let the BAR Attorneys
    4

    continue in their 3obs as !ro!erty trans&er agent-o&&icers &or the cor!orate “STAT"# but i& no “!erson"# “na'e"# “de&endant# hires the'" they$ll ha%e to get new 3obs or they$ll star%e. <ire your BAR Attorney and !resent the “!erson# “trust account# “na'e# in your !ri%ate ca!acity as lawyer-in-&act" or hire any non-BAR-licensed lawyer to assist you &ro' outside the courtroo' bar.
    'efuse to acnowledge all judges who are also licensed &A' Attorneys *very judge in Florida -tate is a member of the Florida &A' This is unlawful and unconstitutional as a judge cannot be an *s+uire nor can he represent any issue in commerce, such as that of the -TAT*! *very Florida -tate judge has compromised his purported neutral and impartial judicial position by being a -tate .fficer (employee!) through his &A' licensure This is an unlawful monopoly of power and commerce (closed/union/shop!) The 0nauthori1ed 2ractice of 3aw
    <ire your BAR Attorney. Re&use to ac*nowledge their corru!t inner-bar courts o& thie%ery. &&ice-o&-PRS>N See2 htt!2www.scribd.co’doc8:=K9:;;;o”on-Law-Trust-Ta,-,e’!t-<oreign-Status-Public- Notice-Public-Record
    5

  29. Title 42 USC 18115 is in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

    http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-111publ148/html/PLAW-111publ148.htm

    SEC. 1555. <> FREEDOM NOT TO PARTICIPATE IN
    FEDERAL HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAMS.

    No individual, company, business, nonprofit entity, or health
    insurance issuer offering group or individual health insurance coverage
    shall be required to participate in any Federal health insurance program
    created under this Act (or any amendments made by this Act), or in any
    Federal health insurance program expanded by this Act (or any such
    amendments), and there shall be no penalty or fine imposed upon any such
    issuer for choosing not to participate in such programs.

  30. (Updated Nov. 27, 2002)

    “BRITISH ACCREDITED REGISTRY”

    Several years ago, I encountered on the Net a man named David Gould who made the groundless assertion that the word “BAR” in reference to professional associations of lawyers meant “British Accreditation Regency”. This nonsense appeared to be nothing more than disinformation promoted by wild-eyed gurus, typically associated with Wrong Way Law types who believed arguments like the missing 13th Amendment, names in CAPS, etc. Gould was reputed to be addicted to TV cartoon shows and he obtained his legal information only from the Net. During a trip to Phoenix in early 2000, I learned that Gould apparently acquired this idea about “BAR” from another man named Sean Rice, who at the time was leagued in some fashion with the Zidar group in Phoenix. Later information from those who knew Rice clearly indicated that Rice was at least a confidential informant (“CI”) working with federal law enforcement. The feds do have an interest in sowing garbage arguments in the freedom movement. The feds also love to have people act on their own without benefit of sound advice from legal counsel.

    But over time, more and more gurus have been making this unfounded claim. For example, one promoter’s web site states:

    “The owners who control the American BAR Association are a private corporation whose headquarters are located in England. BAR stands for British Accredited Registry. Attorneys at law are given the title of ‘Esquire’ through the BAR, a title meaning ‘Shield Bearer’; they carry this shield for the ‘Crown of the City of London’. Attorney: one who transfers or assigns property, rights, title and allegiance to the owner of the land.”

    There are probably 4 or 5 other promoters of this idea which lacks any factual basis.

    I suggest that the American Bar Association itself be consulted to determine whether the above contention is correct. At the ABA web site, this is found:

    “The ABA was founded on August 21, 1878, in Saratoga Springs, New York, by 100 lawyers from 21 states.”

    The original constitution for that organization, as amended, still governs it. Its headquarters are located at American Bar Association, 740 15th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20005-1019. It declares that “the ABA is a national, voluntary professional organization. We have no role in administering bar exams or licensing attorneys in the U.S.” It has no legal association with Britain or its Monarch. Only American lawyers and others having related occupations (like law librarians) can join (there is an international section of “associates”). Not every American lawyer is a member; I am not and I know many others who are not.

    Further, a search on the Net regarding either the terms “British Accreditation Regency” or “British Accredited Registry” reveals that such an entity does not exist. If it exists, what is the address of BAR? If it exists at all, it is in the minds of the promoters of this nonsense.

    What about this supposed allegiance to the “Crown”? Alabama lawyers take, via Alabama Code §34-3-15, the following oath:

    “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will demean myself as an attorney, according to the best of my learning and ability, and with all good fidelity, as well to the court as to the client; that I will use no falsehood or delay any person’s cause for lucre or malice and that I will support the Constitution of the state of Alabama and of the United States, so long as I continue a citizen thereof, so help me God.”

    Nothing in this oath mentions anything about having allegiance to British entities. Instead, when I was sworn, I made an oath to support the US and Alabama Constitutions, not something British, either its people or the British “unwritten” constitution. See the oath for Mississippi lawyers, and Georgia’s Rule 16, Rules for Governing Admission to the Practice of Law.

    The oath taken by Florida lawyers is as follows:

    “I do solemnly swear:

    “I will support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of Florida;

    “I will maintain the respect due to courts of justice and judicial officers;

    “I will not counsel or maintain any suit or proceedings which shall appear to me to be unjust, nor any defense except such as I believe to be honestly debatable under the law of the land;

    “I will employ for the purpose of maintaining the causes confided to me such means only as are consistent with truth and honor, and will never seek to mislead the judge or jury by any artifice or false statement of fact or law;

    “I will maintain the confidence and preserve inviolate the secrets of my clients, and will accept no compensation in connection with their business except from them or with their knowledge and approval;

    “I will abstain from all offensive personality and advance no fact prejudicial to the honor or reputation of a party or witness, unless required by the justice of the cause with which I am charged;

    “I will never reject, from any consideration personal to myself, the cause of the defenseless or oppressed, or delay anyone’s cause for lucre or malice. So help me God.”

    Rule 402, South Carolina Appellate Court Rules, provides that lawyers are to take the following oath:

    “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that:

    “I am duly qualified, according to the Constitution of this State, to exercise the duties of the office to which I have been appointed, and that I will, to the best of my ability, discharge those duties and will preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of this State and of the United States;

    “I will maintain the respect due to courts of justice and judicial officers;

    “I will not counsel or maintain any suit or proceeding which shall appear to me to be unjust, nor any defenses except those I believe to be honestly debatable under the law of the land; but this obligation shall not prevent me from defending a person charged with crime;

    “I will employ for the purpose of maintaining the causes confided to me only such means as are consistent with trust and honor, and will never seek to mislead the judge or jury by an artifice or false statement of fact or law;

    “I will respect the confidence and preserve inviolate the secrets of my client, and will accept no compensation in connection with a client’s business except from the client or with the client’s knowledge and approval;

    “I will abstain from all offensive personalities, and advance no fact prejudicial to the honor or reputation of a party or witness, unless required by the justice of the cause with which I am charged;

    “I will never reject, from any consideration personal to myself, the cause of the defenseless or oppressed, or delay any person’s cause for lucre or malice;

    “So help me God.”

    Oaths taken by attorneys in other States are similar. For example, the statutorily mandated oath in Oklahoma provides:

    “Upon being permitted to practice as attorneys and counselors at law, they shall, in open court, take the following oath: You do solemnly swear that you will support, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of Oklahoma; that you will do no falsehood or consent that any be done in court, and if you know of any you will give knowledge thereof to the judges of the court, or some one of them, that it may be reformed; you will not wittingly, willingly or knowingly promote, sue, or procure to be sued, any false or unlawful suit, or give aid or consent to the same; you will delay no man for lucre or malice, but will act in the office of attorney in this court according to your best learning and discretion, with all good fidelity as well to the court as to your client, so help you God.” 5 O.S. § 2 (OSCN 2001).

    The oath Tennessee lawyers take is somewhat shorter. Rule 6, Tennessee Rules of the Supreme Court, requires the following oath for attorneys:

    “I * [name] * do solemnly swear that I will support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of Tennessee, and that I will truly and honestly demean myself in the practice of my profession to the best of my skill and abilities, so help me God.”

    The oath Texas lawyers take is:

    “I, (name), do solemnly swear that I will support the constitution of the United States, and of this State; that I will honestly demean myself in the practice of the law, and will discharge my duties to my clients to the best of my ability. So help me God.”

    Wyoming Code §33-5-112 provides:

    “No person shall be deemed admitted to the bar until he shall have taken an oath to the effect that he will support, obey, and defend the constitution of the United States, and the constitution and laws of this state, and that he will faithfully and honestly and to the best of his ability discharge the duties of an attorney and counselor-at-law.”

    See also California Business and Professions Code §§6067-68, Indiana Code §33-21-1-1, Idaho Code §3-201, Kentucky SCR §2.010, Montana Code §37-61-207, North Carolina Gen. Statutes §11-11, and Virginia Code § 54.1-3903.

    Precisely where does one find this supposed allegiance to the “Crown of the City of London”? If anything, attorneys have taken an oath and are “shield bearers” to not only their clients, but also for the U.S. and various State constitutions.

    A lawyer upon admission to a State bar association enters a regulated profession. To become a lawyer, one must today attend college and graduate, and then attend three years of law school. After graduation, the bar exam must be taken and passed. Then a lawyer is sworn and I doubt that any of the statutorily mandated oaths of any State of this nation is substantially different from the oath I took and the others noted above.

    The profession itself imposes certain duties upon lawyers, including ethical conduct. The ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct are posted at the web site of the ABA. If you want to read the ethical rules for lawyers in all of the American States, this site at Cornell contains the links. This FindLaw link will also send you to these rules of ethics. See also CODE OF CONDUCT FOR UNITED STATES JUDGES.

    What legal training do these gurus have? Are they under any legal obligation to provide sound legal advice? The absence of any such duty on their part leaves them free to promote whatever wacky ideas they want, dressed in the garb of a legal argument. This is why they promote arguments like the UCC, redemption, three judge courts, “we are Brits,” and others noted on this web site. To dissuade you from seeking the advice of a competent lawyer regarding the validity of the arguments of gurus, they have invented this baseless “Bar” contention, which I trace back to Sean Rice. Federal and state law enforcement agencies surely desire to have people in the freedom movement following utterly groundless legal arguments: it makes their job easier.

    These same “Bar” contention gurus also try to make a case based upon the word, “attorn.” Webster’s 1828 dictionary defines “attorn” as follows: “To turn * * * In the feudal law, to turn, or transfer homage and service from one lord to another. This is the act of feudatories, vassals or tenants, upon the alienation of the estate.” History of feudal times provides the meaning of this term. After the Norman conquest in 1066, feudalism was completely established in England (this system had its origins in Medieval Europe). The nobility were the friends and court favorites of the monarch and consequently held estates beneath the King, who owned all the land. Possession of the land was similarly held at will by other parties below the nobles. But nobody “owned” (in the modern sense of ownership) the land; it was owned by the King. These “at will” estates allowed an occupant to possess the land so long as duties of “homage and service” to the superior were met. See the Calverts of Maryland. The most common duties included making payments of rents and crops, providing soldiers for defense and for war, etc. Some of these duties were discharged by new brides: their wedding nights were spent not with their new husbands, but with the landlord (“first night”). But the most important duty was that of allegiance of the tenant to his landlord. These duties were often oppressive, leading to controversies and revolts.

    If a tenant desired to vacate his estate and transfer it to another, the superior landlord had to approve. Obviously if the estate in question was that of a mere villein, the landlord most likely would only want a hard worker in his place. But for larger estates, there were obviously different considerations for landlords. If some duke who was the immediate tenant of the King wanted to leave England to marry and live in France, the King would only approve someone whom he knew was absolutely faithful to him. Thus, changes in estates from one tenant to another were complicated procedures. And a change of the estate of a duke, for example, required those who were his tenants to pay the same “homage and services” to the new landlord. But it seems fair to say that most changes in estates, “attorning,” were accomplished by the parties themselves without the assistance of any other person. If another party did assist this procedure in some way, that party was obviously someone who was well connected and politically astute. It did not require, however, somebody like a lawyer.

    But in a sense, “feudalism” itself was “attorned” and the lawyers did it. Over a period of several hundred years, the old common lawyers methodically kept arguing and getting judicial approval for recognition of ownership rights in land. Slowly and surely, the courts began to recognize that tenants had certain rights to the land they possessed and eventually, the tenants became owners. Over time, the Monarchs lost title of the land to the tenants. While at the height of feudalism in England, a king could go anywhere he wanted and could even force villeins to build bridges for him over creeks, eventually the king not only lost title to the land, but it became recognized that a mere villein was “king of his own castle” and the king could not even enter his humble abode. This “alienation of the estate” away from the King to the tenants was the accomplishment of the old common lawyers and judges.

    I wish that the “attorn” advocates would get the story straight. Perhaps they would learn something by watching some movies about feudal England, like “Braveheart.” They don’t because they fail to read and study (or watch movies); they are prone to just follow rumor and hearsay rather than making the effort to confirm the accuracy of an historical fact or law. This explains why they build and sell arguments based upon statutes that no longer exist. To confirm that which I stated above regarding lawyers “attorning the king,” may I suggest Bergin & Haskell’s Estates in Land and Future Interests, which explains this evolution of estates from ownership of the king to the tenants. Of course, there are other similar works in law libraries, but I doubt that any of these “Bar” advocates can find their way there. But if they did, they would be lost once inside.

    Those who advocate this “BAR” argument are using lies to sell garbage legal arguments like names in CAPS, missing 13th Amendment, redemption, etc. If you buy into their position, expect to be sold some trashy legal argument without substance (“make yourself an alien”). These gurus do not want you to ask a lawyer whether the legal arguments they promote have any validity. Buyer beware.

    As to the merits of the argument about citizenship which TBA promotes, these cases must be addressed:

    1. McKinney v. Regan, 599 F.Supp. 126, 129 (M.D.La. 1984)(“Petitioner’s shield of the ‘Common Law’ as an ‘Unenfranchised Sovereign Individual of the United States of America, a Republic,’ provides him with precisely the same degree of protection from federal income taxation as did the Ghost Dance of the Sioux warrior from the repeating rifles of the federal Calvary [sic] — ZERO”)

    3. United States v. Kruger, 923 F.2d 587, 587-88 (8th Cir. 1991)(“The Krugers’ principle argument below and on appeal is that the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution unlawfully purported to bestow citizenship upon non-white races and other ‘artificial statutory persons.’ This argument is absurd”).

    Recent Note

    I e-mailed the following request to one of the advocates of this argument:

    Subject: The BAR
    Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 10:34:18 -0600
    From: Larry Becraft
    To: gd@tbafoundation.com

    At your web site, the following assertions are posted:

    The system at hand, controlled by an esoteric organization known as the Bar Association (a product of international bankers),

    The owners who control the American BAR Association are a private corporation whose headquarters are located in England. BAR stands for British Accredited Registry. Attorneys at law are given the title of “Esquire” through the BAR, a title meaning “Shield Bearer”; they carry this shield for the “Crown of the City of London”. Attorney: one who transfers or assigns property, rights, title and allegiance to the owner of the land.

    I am interested in contacting this esoteric organization, the British Accredited Registry, to verify the above facts. Can you please provide to me its address and phone number?

    Larry Becraft

    This is the recent reply I received:

    Subject: RE: The BAR
    Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 13:37:28 -0500
    From: “GD Holmes”
    Organization: Taking Back America
    To: “‘Larry Becraft'”

    http://www.abanet.org/annual/2000/death.html

    Yours in Truth and Freedom,

    GD
    National Marketing
    Director_______________________________________________
    GD Holmes [GDHolmes@TBAFoundation.com]
    Taking Back America [http://www.TBAFoundation.com]
    PH: 407-292-7249
    FAX: 407-292-7899

    The above link appears to be the “proof” that BAR means British Accredited Registry. However, this link is an old one which merely publicizes a meeting of ABA members who are death penalty opponents. That particular section of the ABA held a meeting in London with other death penalty opponents from other countries back on July 18, 2000. Therefore, merely holding a meeting in another country with other lawyers having an interest in an issue of this type is “proof” to these advocates regarding the BAR contention!!

    Clearly, this was merely a meeting set up for the convenience of the attendees, American and foreigners. Such meetings are frequently held so that attendees can combine both vacation and work together. Wives do not attends such meetings; they take tours of the cities where these events are held. After such events, social programs are often held. Not only do lawyers have meetings in interesting places, so do other professions.

    Using this rational, when the family law section of the Alabama Bar meets in Pensacola during the summer for both vacation and work, it must be a part of the Florida Bar. When the corporate section of the Alabama Bar decides to hold meetings in Vale, CO, they must really be Colorado lawyers.

    Will someone please provide to me the address of BAR? Apparently, those who make this argument cannot find this group (outside their own heads).

    Here is a recent e-mail from a TBA client:

    Subject: Re: TOTAL LACK OF INTEGRITY OF TBA
    Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 10:57:26 -0800
    From: “Dennis MacPhaeddon”
    To: “Marty Cooper”
    References: 1

    To Marty and Austin Gary Copper,

    I can not believe your arrogance. I got documents from your organization (TBA) with the WRONG NAME on them and pages of other mistakes which I faxed back, (AT YOUR AND GARY’S REQUEST) to your office TWICE to get them corrected which you never did. This has gone on for six months. I PAID YOU TO HAVE A COMPLETE SET OF DOCUMENTS WITH MY NAME ON THEM, NOT SOMEONE ELSE’S. YOU HAVE NO INTEGRITY. This is fraud ! ! You are the cowards by not following through with what you promised plain and simple. NO EXCUSES !!

    I will take the whole package down to show Bob Kelly at the Americans Bulletin along with State and Federal authorities in Oregon. You did not perform AS YOU SAID YOU WOULD.

    Gary if you can not keep your word and perform as you said YOU WOULD TO ME
    ON THE PHONE then cease and desist promoting TBA. How many other people have you screwed? ENOUGH IS ENOUGH ! !

    YOU ARE AS BAD AS THE SHYSTER ATTORNEY’S AND BAR ASSOCIATION YOU PURPORT TO OBJECT TO. I WOULD BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO RETURN YOUR WHOLE PACKAGE OF LOUSY PAPERWORK WHEN YOU RETURN MY MONEY. YOU ARE THE ONES FLYING ALL OVER THE COUNTRY PROMOTING THIS SCHEME, NOT ME.

    YOU ARE ONES ENGAGED IN COMMERCE OVER STATE LINES AND THROUGH THE US MAIL FOR PROFIT, NOT ME.

    TO SHOW THE KIND OF LOUSY WORK YOU DO I WILL PUBLISH YOUR WORK IN ANY FORUM I CAN.

    THIS IS BEING FORWARDED TO EVERYONE ON MY LIST TO BE FORWARDED AS FAR AND WIDE AS POSSIBLE. YOU HAVE SCREWED THE WRONG MAN HERE AND I OBJECT TO YOUR TOTAL LACK OF INTEGRITY.

    I HAVE GIVEN YOU THREE CHANCES TO ACT HONORABLY AND YOU CHOOSE NOT TO DO SO. WHAT DOES THIS SAY ABOUT YOU?

    Dennis Ward

    To everyone on my list.

    The above correspondence is to Marty and Austin Gary Cooper at the TBA Foundation who has gone around the country promoting Expatriation/Repatriation as a way to get out of the system and assert your sovereignty by repatriating to the REPUBLIC. It is promoted by Austin Gary Cooper out of Florida. They supposedly do all of the paperwork FOR YOU, send it to you to sign and then you send out to all of the usual suspects. The problem is they did not get it right and sent my packet of documents with the WRONG NAME on some of the documents. I immediately tried to get new documents and faxed the incorrect ones back so they could see what they did wrong. I can provide anyone with copies of what they sent and the type of lousy work they do. I HAVE HEARD OF OTHERS HAVING THE SAME TYPES OF PROBLEMS WITH LACK OF FOLLOW THROUGH, INTEGRITY AND SUPPORT. IN ESSENCE THEY PROMISE AND DO NOT DELIVER.

    I and a FRIEND WENT TO HEAR Austin Gary Cooper in Medford, Oregon last summer and signed up on the basis of his presentation.

    This lack of follow through was the last straw. I have been screwed over for the last time by these so called “Christian Patriots”. This is totally unacceptable. If you want more info I will by happy to send you copies of the documentation to prove what I say. Please forward this to everyone on your list so that others will not be ripped off by TBA. Spread the word. Thank you for taking the time to read this. We have to clean up our own house before we can clean out the rest of the vermin.

    Dennis

    TBA’s Revised Arguments

    Apparently in response to the above, TBA has dropped its groundless allegations regarding the ABA and BAR, apparently conceding that such an argument is baseless. Now, however, it has adopted a “new” contention. This argument was “developed” by Larry Wilkins of Florida, a/k/a “Anthony Wayne” who has in the past had a web site at “IResist” but which is now no longer hosted there. Instead of actually doing some real research, TBA has taken the full argument concocted by Wilkins. But likewise, this “new” argument is just simply crazy.

    This new argument places great emphasis upon events of the Revolutionary War and it contends that the United States of America is really, even today, nothing but “States of the British Crown”, a condition resulting from some shenanigans of “The Crown Temple” during that era. Wilkins should get a job as a science fiction writer. TBA get an “F” in history.

    This new argument contains the following point:

    So then, what debts were owed to the Crown Temple and their banks as of 1883? In the Contract Between the King and the Thirteen United States of North America, signed at Versailles July 16, 1782, Article I states,

    It is agreed and certified that the sums advanced by His Majesty to the Congress of the United States under the title of a loan, in the years 1778, 1779, 1780, 1781, and the present 1782, amount to the sum of eighteen million of livres, money of France, according to the following twenty-one receipts of the above-mentioned underwritten Minister of Congress, given in virtue of his full powers, to wit…

    That amount equals about $18 million dollars, plus interest, that Hamilton’s U.S. Central Bank owed the Crown through Crown Bank loans in France. This was signed, on behalf of the United States, by an already familiar Middle Templar, Benjamin Franklin, Esquire.

    An additional $6 million dollars (six million livres) was loaned to the United States at 5% interest by the same parties in a similar Contract signed on February 25, 1783. The Crown Bankers in the Netherlands and France were calling in their debts for payment by future generations of Americans.

    I am very familiar with this argument; it was “developed” by parties other than Wilkins, who simply copied it from those who first started this fantasy.

    These people contend that during the Revolutionary War, we really were not at war with the King of England and proof of this consists of a loan the King made to the United States on July 16, 1782. Liars like these expect that people will never engage in any research to determine the truth of the matter. In this instance, Wilkins and TBA both propound false ideas; the United States did not borrow money from the English or King George but instead from the King of France.

    First, it should be noted that the United States made treaties with the French early during the Revolutionary War. For example, on February 6, 1778 we entered into two treaties with France; see 8 Stat. 6 thru page 30. If you have never read treaties in the U.S. Statutes at Large, you need a pointer before you start. Frequently, treaties with other nations are printed in both the written English language (another conspiracy: we speak English!!!) and the language of the other nation. When you click onto the above link, you will find alternating pages of these treaties in English and also French. This historical document alone seems to abundantly prove that we were in fact at war with Britain and the French were our allies.

    Was this loan received by the United States on July 16, 1782 one we received from the King of England? Let’s examine the loan agreement itself; see 8 Stat. 614. The name “most Christian Majesty” designates the King of France. I don’t know who the “count Gravier de Vergennes” is, but quite obviously he was French. The document was signed at Versailles, and the loan was made in French funds, to be repaid in Paris. The loan agreement mentions the treaty with France dated February 6, 1778. London and Paris are in two different countries. Thos who claim that this loan was obtained from the King of England are either stupid, or they are liars who depend upon gullible people.

    The “new” TBA argument also contends that the United States of America are really “Crown Templar possessions” or “Crown Temple States”. It is simply hard to believe that this debunked “We Are Brits” argument still is being promoted. If you read my “We Ain’t Brits” article, you can see that both American and English courts rejected long ago that we are Brits and that the Brits or their monarch have any claim to any part of our country or government. These contentions are not just “against the grain,” they are against reality and historical fact.

    There is no need to address further aspects of this incredibly stupid argument other than a few. TBA contends that the International Bar Association (which incidentally was created after WWII) is “physically located at Chancery Lane behind Fleet Street in London” and within the confines of the Inns. The truth is that the IBA has the address of 271 Regent Street, London. If you pull up the links below for the Inns of Court, a map of the area of the Inns is also posted. You can’t find Regent Street on those maps. Obviously, the IBA is not physically located at or near the Inns. But I also wonder: how can local state bar associations created in the last hundred years be mere franchises of the IBA, which was not created until after WWII?

    TBA wastes lots of its breath asserting that four old English law schools are at the heart of some world conspiracy. Why don’t you examine these for yourself:

    Inns of Court The Four Inns The Lincoln Inn The Gray’s Inn

    The Middle Temple The Inner Temple

    These old law schools have tradition and lots of history. They were bombed by the Germans during the London bombings of WWII. Now I have a flash of insight: WWII was really a battle of the law schools!!!
    In conclusion, TBA’s “new argument” makes wonderful science fiction, like much being promoted by the gurus in the freedom movement: birth certificates, names in CAPS, etc. No wonder this movement has such a bad name and is believed by many Americans to be composed of idiots. The proof is everywhere.

    Note of Nov. 27, 2002:

    TBA refuses to provide the address and phone for “BAR.”

    Subject: Re: BAR revisited
    http://home.hiwaay.net/~becraft/BAR.html
    Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 15:36:53 -0500
    From: Larry Becraft
    To: Marty Cooper
    CC: Frank Wall

    Marty,

    I have investigated this whole allegation regarding the existence of some sinister entity named British Accreditation Registry and found absolutely no basis for the contention. It first started with Anthony Wayne, also from Florida, whose real name is Larry Wilkins. He promoted the idea and a few others, notably TBA, have followed suit. Advocacy of this argument is very revealing: it reveals to me that those promoting the position utterly lack any ability to research.

    I know that such an entity does not exist in reality, and exists only in the fertile minds of those merely believing otherwise. In fact, I asked GD Holmes, who like Butch formerly were a part of the TBA organization, to provide the slightest scintilla of proof of the existence of that organization. I was provided only this link from an article posted at the ABA web site as “proof” that BAR exists:

    http://www.abanet.org/annual/2000/death.html

    Look at this link yourself and you will easily see that it constitutes no proof whatsoever.

    If this organization exists (and I know it does not), then it would be a very simple matter to provide the address and phone for the headquarters of British Accreditation Registry. Providing the addresses and phones of English law schools simply avoids answering this question. Giving your version of a mere reaction from a federal prosecutor is no proof whatsoever.

    I am very interested in the abilities of the principals of TBA to back up with actual proof an allegation you make. Should be very simple, if true.

    BTW: what is your position regarding GD and Butch leaving TBA?

    Larry

    Return to: Destroyed Arguments
    ABA Annual Meeting
    americanbar.org
    null
    Like · · Share · December 31, 2013 at 4:45pm

    Seen by 2
    Edward Johnston
    Write a comment…

  31. Common Law Right to Travel:

    Arizona Senator’s Letter to State Officials

    On December 10, 1985, Arizona State Senator Wayne Stump addressed a letter to the State’s Director of Public Safety, Ralph Milstead, that is sure to shake up the bureaucracy. The same letter was addressed to the sheriff of every county, every police chief, and the head of every law enforcement agency having to do with traffic regulation in the State of Arizona.

    Let the letter speak for itself: “It has come to my attention that numerous individuals in our state have rescinded all of their contracts with the United States federal government, the State of Arizona, and each of its political subdivisions, establishing themselves as freemen under the organic national Constitution of the Republic of the United States of America. Consequently, they may be driving without auto registration, driver’s license, or any other evidence of contract.

    “Because many law enforcement personnel may be unaware of the contractual nature of auto registration and driver’s licenses, it is conceivable that this situation may lead to confrontation between these individuals and law enforcement personnel.

    “I urge you to inform yourself and your personnel about this matter as soon as possible. If you would like to be briefed by someone knowledgeable on this subject, please contact me.

    “In the meantime, inasmuch as this procedure is entirely appropriate when properly carried out, I would like to be personally notified of every such instance of confrontation in order that the persons involved and the public officials involved may be apprised of the correct procedure and the appropriateness of their actions on the part of each concerned.

    “My office phone is (602) 255-5261 and I am requesting to be notified of the names and incidents along with addresses and phone numbers of participants of any such confrontations arising from the exercise of a person’s freeman status in order to evaluate the outcome of properly rescinded contracts.

    Sincerely,

    Wayne Stump
    State Senator
    State Capitol – Senate Wing
    Phoenix, Arizona 85007

    [Reprinted from `Freedom League Newsletter’, January 1986]

    ————————————————————————————————————-

    A STATE SENATOR EXPLAINS

    14TH AMENDMENT

    CITIZENSHIP

    The 14th Amendment was not properly ratified by the states of the Union. Like the 16th and 17th Amendments, it is a law that does not exist. We must begin forcing the dialogue in political discussions, meetings and talk radio to these key, core issues.

    They are critical to the Unseen Hand and continuing to yap about the symptoms instead of the treatment won’t get the issues out into the public domain.

    The following is a reprint from the Free Enterprise Society’s newsletter, May 1989. It is authored by former Arizona State Senator Wayne Stump:

    To whom it may concern:

    “As my interest in constitutional law has expanded over the past years and the word of my interest spread, I have happily become the recipient of Patriot papers, circulars and letters from all over this great land.

    Many folks involved in the research and use of the principles involved in our “Republican” form of government have become personal friends. These friendships have enabled a great deal of activity, from diverse sources, to develop together for comparison and evaluation.

    I have, from time to time, endeavored to pass information, on a limited basis, from one source to another for enlightenment of individuals on general issues.

    This time, however, it would appear that the emerging principles are so fundamental to our form of government, and of such magnitude as to encompass every man, woman and child in our united Republics, that one wonders how they could have ever become obscured.

    The principles to which I refer are those heralded in the Preamble of the Constitution, which beings: “We, the People….” and continues “….secure the blessings of Liberty to

    Ourselves and our Posterity.” These words, without question, were used to represent the interests of the signers of the Constitutional contract. That is to say, “The Founding Fathers and their Posterity.”

    When one reflects on this meaning of “We the People” it would seem to mean that the Preamble People were a class of people who, with the aid of God, originally secured their Liberty with the protections they constructed into the Organic Constitution and the first ten Amendments thereto. This, being the case, tends to bring the import of the 14th

    Amendment into focus.

    The 13th and 14th Amendments, as we have been taught, were fashioned to give freedom to slaves and to secure for them privileges of citizenship.

    Our Educators, however, neglected to explain that the 14th Amendment creation was that of a new “class” of citizenship. It becomes clear when one studies the wording of the Organic Constitution, that the original people cited in the “Preamble” could not lose the “Blessings” secured thereby as long as the Constitution was intact, because our Constitution is perpetual.

    The 14th Amendment, then had to create another “position” for those persons for whom it was created. Scrutiny of the 14th Amendment reveals that persons encompassed thereby were “subject” to jurisdiction thereof and may not “question” the validity of the public debt.

    Big “C” — Little “c”

    When this Nation was founded each of the individual States of this union had their own Citizens (spelled with a capital “C”). Today, we have a second class of citizen (note the small “c”), the 14th Amendment citizen.

    In law, every letter in a word is important. A word capitalized may mean one specific thing, while the same word without capitalization may mean something entirely different. In the case of Citizenship (or citizenship), this is more certainly true.

    There is a clear distinction between national and State citizenship, U.S. citizenship does not entitle citizen of the privileges and Immunities of the Citizen of the State. K. Tashiro v. Jordan, 256 P 545, affirmed 49 S Ct 47, 278 US 123

    Black’s Law Dictionary, 5th Edition, agrees with the distinction between these different classes of (C)itizenship: There are two Privileges and Immunities Clauses in the federal Constitution and Amendments, the first being found in Art. IV, and the second in the 14th Amendment. Section 1, second sentence, clause 1. The provision in Art. IV states that “The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States, while the 14th Amendment provides that “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States.

    Note the lack of capitalization in the wording used in the 14th Amendment, this specifically means that the words “citizens, privileges, immunities” are not the same as in Article IV. The State of California was admitted into the Union of the United States in 1949; 9 Statutes at Large 452. It was admitted on an equal footing with the original States in all respects whatsoever.

    The State of California was required to have its own Citizens, who were first State Citizens, then as a consequence of State Citizenship were American Citizens, known as Citizens of the United States. There was no specific class as this, but for traveling and protection by the United States government while out of the country, they were generally called Citizens of the United States.

    The Constitution for the United States of America (1787) used the term “Citizen of the United States” in Article I, Section 2, (capital “C”), and numerous other sections. This referred to the Sovereign Political Body of State Citizens, this Citizen is entitled to all the Privileges and Immunities of the Citizens of the several States under Article IV.

    Congress utilized the same term “citizen of the United States” qualifying it with a small “c” to distinguish “federal citizen” in the so-called 14th Amendment. These “citizens” have only statutory rights granted by Congress.

    Thus, Congress and most of the Judiciary, without distinction being properly brought forth have made rulings based upon the federal “citizens” who are resident in a State, not State Citizens domiciled within their own State.

    The statement by Chief Justice Taney in Dred Scott v. Stanford, 19 How. 393, 422, in defining the term “persons” the Judge stated:

    ……persons who are not recognized as Citizens,”. See also American and Ocean Ins. Co. V. Canter, 1 Pet. 511, which also distinguishes “persons” and “Citizens.” These were the persons that were the object of the 14th Amendment, to give to this class of native born “persons” who were “resident” in the union of the United States citizenship, and authority to place other than the white race within the special category of”citizen of the United States.”

    To overcome the statement in Dred Scott, supra, that only white people were Citizens, and all other persons were only “residents” without citizenship of the United States, Congress then passed the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 14 STAT 27.

    The Act of Congress called the Civil Rights Act, 14 U.S. Stats. At Large, pg 27, which was the forerunner of the 14th Amendment, amply shows the intent of Congress:

    All persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States, and such citizens of every race and color…shall have the same right in every state and territory of the United States…to full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of person and property as is enjoyed by white citizens,

    (Again, note the lack of capitalization)

    This was the intent of Congress; not to infringe upon the Constitution or the state of the de jure Citizens of the several states. It was never the intent of the 14th Amendment to subvert the States’ authority or that of the Constitution as it relates to the status of the de jure State Citizens. People v. Washington, 36 C 658, 661 (1869) over ruled on other grounds; French v. Barber, 181 US 324; MacKenzie v. Hare, 60 L Ed 297

    At this point, I anticipate a lot of folks reading this article are going into shock as they grab for the Constitution to check out the phrase and “question” of the validity of the public debt. Let me help you by reference to section 4 of the 14th Amendment and caution you to hold onto your chair.

    It would seen then, from the foregoing, that there are two “classes” of citizens in this country:

    1. Preamble Citizen: persons born or naturalized within the meaning of the Organic Constitution and inhabiting one of the several Republics of the United States who enjoy full citizenship of the Organic Constitution as Citizens of the Republic which they inhabit.

    2. Citizen “subject”: persons enfranchised by the 14th Amendment who are born or naturalized in the United States within the meaning of the 14th Amendment and are residing therein as a United States citizen and are enjoying the privileges and immunities of “limited” citizenship.

    It is not my intention, in this article, to become technically involved in citations for the information introduced here, but only to outline an overview for those folks who claim “Constitutional Rights” and then wonder why the legislatures, courts and police don’t respond in “kind” to these claims.

    When one separates the classes among their appropriate dividing lines, it appears that:

    1. Preamble Citizens:
    a. Have direct personal access to a God inspired, original Constitution and it’s restraints on government for the protection of life, liberty and property.
    b. Have direct personal access to the Article III courts known as “justice courts” which deal with law.

    2. Citizen “subjects”:
    a. Have representative access to the first eight amendments as purviewed by the 14th Amendment. b. Have representative access to Article 1 courts, provided by legislature, that are known as “legislative courts” which deal with statutes and are served by bar members, or officers of the court, known as lawyers.

    My concern here, stems from my observation that folks involved with the preservation of our beloved Constitution are unaware of the “limited” citizenship created by the 14th Amendment. Additionally, these folks don’t realize that they are, or have voluntarily become, citizen subjects because of their acceptance of the “benefits” of limited citizenship.

    The main “benefit” that I will mention here is Social Security. There are many other “benefits” such as the benefit of “regulation by licensing” that give control of your children to the State by making them “wards of the State” and subject to the “regulation” of the “legislative courts” by statute, etc.

    The intention of this article is to point out the apparent difference in the classes of citizenship and the difference in the courts in serving these classes.

    I have noticed that, in many publications, and also personal conversations, people convey their feelings of alarm or despair in finding that “the court” or “government” is in violation of the Constitution without realizing that the court they are addressing is a legislative court and does not hear cases based on justice, but rather, cases based only on statute law.

    The reality of the following example of statute law is that the statute specifies a speed limit to be held at 30 m.p.h. The only question that can be entertained by the court is that of whether the accused did in fact go faster than the limit. That is a yes or no question. The accused cannot try to tell the court that it was a six lane highway on a clear day with no traffic in sight and that his speed of 60 m.p.h. did not injure anyone.

    The court is not obligated to hear that argument as it is not a justice court. The final question then would seem to be “where is the article III “justice” court and who can use it? I am very aware that many of the folks reading this article are not going to be able to use the justice courts, as they have natural or acquired deficiencies that will not allow them Preamble Citizenship, but for the people endowed with the proper qualifications, it appears that the straight line approach of barring jurisdiction of legislative courts (tribunals) through recision of contracts and declaration of Article
    IV, Section 2 status is essential, as it appears that only Preamble People can exercise the offices as set forth in the Organic Constitution. Additionally, it seems that this same class (Preamble People) is the only class that may claim the protection of the first ten Amendments as written.

    As the truth of our personal status, and the responsibilities connected therewith unfolds, it becomes clear that the Article III “justice” court must be accessed individually by the person claiming the right. At present it is being done by common law filing of actions “in law” with the County Recorders who have been found to be “ex officio” clerks of the County courts. The authority for the exercise of the “justice” office is found in the 9th Article of Amendment and I believe all State Constitutions have similar provisions for the Preamble Citizens (also known as de jure Citizens).

    I will not go farther with an attempt toward instruction but will leave this in the hands of the many patriots engaged in the research of these developments. My mission in presenting this information in a general sense is to help the unfortunate individuals who repeatedly bash themselves against the rocks of misinformation or ignorance in vain, though laudable, effort to protect our beloved Constitution. I hope I have achieved this end.”

    It would appear that this former Arizona State Senator was a right-wing, anti-government wacko!

    Now, what does this all mean? It means that unless and until the people of this country move the dialogue away from pap like “can John McCain raise enough money….” or “more money for education” malarkey, to how these key problems got started, America will continue to drown in rage, heartbreak, misery and anger that will turn to anarchy.

    Are the pieces to the puzzle starting to fall into place? Do a lot more things make sense now when you reflect upon the words above with personal life experience? Do you understand just how duplicitous and devious this government is and has been for a long, long time? Can you now understand why it was so important for the shadow government to comandeer public education in 1978 by creating the Federal Department of Socialist Education and making it a cabinet? Better to teach condoms and “alternative life styles” to children, provide free abortion counseling and eliminate all teaching of the history of this country than to allow the citizenry to discover how they’ve been hoodwinked. Get the population hooked on pornography, drugs, sports and credit cards and wha-la! A greedy, selfish and apathetic people, just ripe for the pickins.

    The 14th Amendment was never properly ratified. As with the 16th and 17th Amendments, it is a law that does not exist. Therefore, I am a Preamble Citizen of the Republic of California. Unfortunately that doesn’t mean squat to this government or our judicial system. The one and only way to rein them in and rectify this mess is to shout down the roof tops about the non- ratification of these three critical new world order amendments and demand that the U.S. Congress come clean with the American people.

    Yes, it is a mess beyond any proportion but our nation cannot continue to survive on these lies. The people of this nation still hold the power if they would just find the courage to exercise it.

    That is the bottom line and that is the only cure. If we have to take to the streets by the tens of thousands, then we must do it. We simply can’t go on with the government’s media complex and these politicians, most of them too stupid to understand what was written above, lying to our nation.

    Call your talk radio host and demand these issues be brought to the forefront or boycott their sponsors. We are at the crossroads in the history of America. We, you, me and everyone else who knows the truth – we can shape the course of history right now and be proud of what we saved. Our country and our children’s birthright – it’s worth fighting for and that stupid tv program or a trip to the mall captivating our people, means nothing. Will you fight without violence by making your voice heard and demand these issues be brought to the forefront of public discussion?

    Devvy Kidd

    October 21, 1999

    ————————————————————————————-

    I have tried to locate Senator Wayne Stump without success as of Feb. 2000. The last known record of him that I was able to find was with the Board of Directors for the National Rifle Association in America during 1995. They have not yet provided any updated contact information for Mr. Stump. The Arizona Department of Public

    Safety does have Ralph Milstead listed as a prior Director (with his picture too).

  32. Lawful Travel Without Automobile Registration or Driver License!! From Chard Blackstone; edited by Robyna Choleton, January 9, 2014 I’ve just received fresh intel here in southern California. An associate has confirmed that UPS drivers, as well as cab drivers only need a Class C “driver” license to get a job driving their motor vehicles. You’ll want to confirm this for yourself, which I highly encourage, because then you’ll have PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE as opposed to mere hearsay. Just call your local yellow cab company, or UPS, and ask them. A Non-Commercial driver license is a fraud, the commercial and non-commercial supposed licenses being the exact SAME THING! A “Non-Commercial Driver License” is a LEGAL TERM OF ART. A LEGAL TERM OF ART can mean something other than what you BELIEVE it means. A DRIVER is someone who’s COMPENSATED, i.e. GETS PAID. But don’t believe me, believe your own EYES! LOOK at what’s written in the screen shot of the STATUTES OF CALIFORNIA. I didn’t make that up, that’s what THEY wrote! DRIVING IS A PROFESSION! A class C license is required to drive a cab. A cab is a motor vehicle. Now take a look at the DRIVER LICENSE issued to you by the DMV. What class is it? Are you beginning to understand? Are you beginning to see? Have you been misled? Have you asked your servants for permission to engage in some activity that you already have the unalienable right to be actually and lawfully involved in? ~~~~~~~~~~~~ “The activity licensed by state DMVs — the operation of motor vehicles — is itself integrally related to interstate commerce”. Seth Waxman, Solicitor General, U.S. Department of Justice Reno v. Condon, 528 U.S. 141, January 12, 2000; Supreme Court of the United States “Section 250… “(a) It is a misdemeanor for any person to drive a motor vehicle upon a highway unless he then holds a valid operator’s or chauffeur’s license…” … driving privileges –- of which the license is but evidence. People v. Noggle (1935), 7 Cal.App. 2d 14, 17, [45 P.2d 430, 432] People v. Higgins (1948) 97 Cal.App.2d Supp. 938 A license proper is a permit to do business which could not be done without the license. City and County of San Francisco v. Liverpool and London and Globe Insurance Company, et al (1887), 74 Cal. 113 “A license is in the general nature of a special privilege, entitling the licensee to do something that he would not be entitled to do without the license”. 51 Am. Jur. 2d., LICENSES AND PERMITS, PART ONE, GENERAL PRINCIPLES, I. GENERAL, § 1. Generally, p. 7 IT IS ILLEGAL TO ENGAGE IN COMMERCE WITHOUT A LICENSE! THE STATE REGULATES COMMERCE. THE POLICE POWER OF THE STATE IS APPLICABLE TO COMMERCE. TRAFFIC = COMMERCE. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 49, Volume 4, Parts 200 to 399 Revised as of October 1, 1999, Page 859 – 865 TITLE 49 — TRANSPORTATION, CHAPTER III — FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION; DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PART 390 — FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY REGULATIONS; GENERAL, Sub-part A — General Applicability and Definitions; Sect. 390.5 Definitions Driver means any person who operates any commercial motor vehicle. Interstate commerce means trade, traffic, or transportation in the United States– (1) Between a place in a State and a place outside of such State (including a place outside of the United States); (2) Between two places in a State through another State or a place outside of the United States; or; (3) Between two places in a State as part of trade, traffic, or transportation. Driving a vehicle and being in actual control of a vehicle are not synonymous. Mercer v. Department of Motor Vehicles, (1991) 53 Cal.3d 753 “Automobile owned by individual not in business is ‘consumer goods’”. In re Rave, 7 UCC rep. Serv 258. “An automobile purchased for personal and family use was ‘consumer goods’”. Bank of Boston v. Jones, 4 UCC Rep. Serv. 1021, 236 A.2d. 484 “The use of an automobile by its owner for purposes of traveling to and from his work is a personal, as opposed to a business use as that term is defined in the California Commercial Code 9109(1), and the automobile will be classified as ‘consumer goods’ rather than equipment. The phraseology of § 9102(2) defining goods used or bought for use primarily in business seems to contemplate a distinction between the collateral automobile ‘in business’ and the mere use of the collateral automobile for some commercial, economic or income producing purpose by one not engaged in ‘business’”. In re Barnes, 11 USS rep. Serv. 697 (1972) “So long as one uses his private property for private purposes and does not devote it to the public use, the public has no interest in it and no voice in its control. Assoc. Pipe v. Railroad Comm. 176 Cal. 518. “Under the UCC § 9-109 there is a real distinction between goods purchased for personal use and those purchase for business use. The two are mutually exclusive and the principal use to which the property is put should be considered as determinitive”. James Talcott, Inc. v. Gee, 5 UCC rep. Serv. 1028, 266 cal.App. 2d. 384, 72 Cal. Reptr. (1968) “The use to which an item is put rather than its physical characteristics, determine whether it should be classified as ‘consumer goods’ under UCC § 9-109(1) or ‘equipment’ under UCC § 9-109(2)”. Grimes v. Massey Ferguson, Inc., 23 UCC Rep. Serv. 655, 355 So. 2d. 338 (Ala.,1978) “A carriage is peculiarly a family or household article. It contributes in a large degree to the health, convenience, comfort and welfare of the householder, or of the family”. Aurthur v. Morgan., 113 U.S. 495, 500, 5 S.Ct. 241, 243 (S.D.Ny 1884) “The term ‘household goods’..includes everything about the house that is usually held and enjoyed therewith and that tends to the comfort and accommodation of the household.” Lawwill v. Lawwill, 515 P.2d. 900, 903, 21 Ariz. App.75, 19A Words and Phrases – Permanent Edition (West) pocket part 94 Courts have no right, no power, to extend statute by construction, so as to dispense with any conditions legislature has seen fit to impose. Gassner v. Patterson, (1863) 23 C. 299; likewise, the Courts must take the statute as they find it. It is their duty to construe it as it stands enacted. Callahan v. San Francisco, (1945) 68 CA2d. 286, 156 P.2d. 479; Santa Clara County Dist. Atty. Investigators Assoc. v. Santa Clara County, (1975) 51 CA 3d.255, 124, Cal. Rptr. 115 Courts are not at liberty to extend application of law to subjects not included within it. Spreckles v. Graham (1924), 194 C. 516, 228 P. 1040 WEST’S ANNOTATED, Commercial Code © 1990 § 9109. Classification of Goods: “Consumer goods”; “Equipment”; “Farm Products”; “Inventory” Goods are: (1) “Consumer goods” if they are used or bought for use primarily for personal, family or household purposes; (2) “Equipment” if they are used or bought for the use primarily in business (including farming or a profession) or by a debtor who is a nonprofit organization or a government subdivision or agency or if the goods are not included in the definitions of inventory, farm products, or consumer goods. California Code Comment, By: John A. Bohn and Charles J. Williams Prior California Law: 1. The classification of goods in this section is new statutory law. The significance of this classification is described in Official Comment 1. Although goods cannot belong to more than one category at any time, they may change their classification depending upon who holds them and for what reason. Each classification is mutually exclusive but the four classifications described are intended to include all goods. Official Comment 2 “The classification of goods in UCC § 9-109 are mutually exclusive”. McFadden v. Mercantile-Safe Deposit & Trust Co., 8 UCC Rep. Serv. 766,260 Md. 601, 273, A.2d. 198 (1971) “Automobile purchased for the purpose of transporting buyer to and from his place of employment was ‘consumer goods’ as defined in UCC § 9-109″. Mallicoat v. Volunteer Finance & Loan Corp., 3 UCC Rep. Serv. 1035,415 S.W. 2d. 347 (Tenn.App., 1966) Your car/ truck/ motorcycle/ van are EITHER — CONSUMER GOODS or EQUIPMENT –- but they CANNOT BE BOTH AT THE SAME TIME! WE’VE BEEN LIED TO, AND THE LIARS AND THIEVES ARE STILL GETTING PAID!

  33. Steve Colter
    I don’t consider Lars my hero,,
    He refuses to allow me on his show,, I have proven the facts, He has copy of them..
    Measure 11 The great Judicial Oregon fraud
    Jay Smith the 14yo in Portland 1988 his Accidental shooting or murder was up to a Jury of his peers and the Victims family to lawfully Decide No the Democracy of maritime fraud courts.Jay body was shove in the back of the garage until the other child of 14yo. told the principle of his school Portland Oregon He was my brother-in-law; were they could find Jay]s body. The Family look for the entire time,,Some how the news media came to the tv public a said we gang task forced , they were not any relationship of any gangs, but lies our so excepted by folks then the truth. Because there personalty can not check out the real facts Please watch,, They give a stock certificate..Birth Certificate they can tell you this
    The Biggest Scam In The History Of Mankind (Debt Ceiling Truth)

    http://banoosh.com/blog/2013/10/16/the-biggest-scam-in-the-history-of-mankind-debt-ceiling-truth/
    Cops have no lawful Authority… https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=1381702145406890

    courts say has to be passed by the lawful Americans two or more generation 1866 civil right act only learn the constitutional laws..http://www.patriotnetwork.info/Citizens_rule_book.htm

    ,It is not the duty of the police to protect you. Their job is to protect the Corporation Called Elected and public employees and arrest commercial code breakers.” (Sapp v. Tallahasee, 348 So. 2nd. 363, Reiff v. City of Philadelphia 477 F.Supp. 1262, Lynch v. N.C. Dept of Justice 376 S. E. 2nd. 247.)http://sedm.org/Forms/05-MemLaw/WhyThiefOrPubOfficer.pdf
    – The lower courts are bound by Supreme Court precedent, Adams v. Department of Juvenile Justice of New York City, 143 F.3d, 61, 65(2nd Cir. 1998)

    THE People” as sovereign?
    Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition
    Attorney General…
    “He is the chief law officer of the federal and state governments with the duty of representing the sovereign, national or state. Johnson v. Commonwealth, ex rel. Meredith, 291 Ky. 829, 165 S.W.2d 820, 826.”
    Listen too With you children.

    “Personal liberty, or the Right to enjoyment of life and liberty, is one of the fundamental or natural Rights, which has been protected by its inclusion as a guarantee in the various constitutions, which is not derived from, or
    dependent on, the U.S. Constitution, which may not be submitted to a vote and may not depend on the outcome of an election. It is one of the most sacred and valuable Rights, as sacred as the Right to private property…and is regarded as UNALIENABLE.” 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, Sect.202, p.987.
    It is not the duty of the police to protect you. Their job is to protect the Corporation and arrest code breakers.” (Sapp v. Tallahasee, 348 So. 2nd. 363, Reiff v. City of Philadelphia 477 F.Supp. 1262, Lynch v. N.C. Dept of Justice 376 S. E. 2nd. 247.) Palazzolo v. Rhode Island | The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent … http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2000/2000_99_2047/ Feb 26, 2001 – Anthony
    EnforcementNotAllowed.htm – Cached ConspiracyWatch> ENFORCEMENT OF CITY/COUNTY CODES PROHIBITED ConspiracyWatch> ENFORCEMENT OF CITY/COUNTY CODES PROHIBITED Jack Bauer bowersecret at gmail.com Thu Jul 1 10:22:56 CDT 2010. Previous message: ConspiracyWatch> Kagan … constitutionalgov.us/pipermail/
    Ok everyone, I want you to pay close attention to what Carl Miller is saying 19 minutes in, in his video, you can now pay your court judgements in coffee beans, at thank you honorable justice James P. Sheehee Michigan monkeywards vs Eugene Glazier docket # 82-002087 52nd 3rd court http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F9fdSirNin
    If you are concerned about your Freedoms,
    Inalienable Rights – Rights which are not capable of being surrendered or transferred without the consent of the one possessing such rights.
    ~ Black’s Law Dictionary
    Also exercising our rights can not be converted into a crime. Most of legislation passed now a days actually does this. It’s a fact. All of these laws that restrict our rights and freedoms which convert them into privileges is known as Statutory Law.
    Inalienable rights are upheld through the common law.
    The common law is God’s law or Universal law and is based on the golden rule which states:
    Do onto other as you have done onto you and do not unto others as you not have others do onto you.
    There are two fundamental principles of common law:
    – Do not infringe upon the rights, freedoms or property of others, and
    – Keep all contracts willingly, knowingly and intentionally (- means dedicated to obeying it).
    The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and the name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.”16th American Jurisprudence 2d, Section 177, late 2nd, Section 256,,,,,,,,Personal liberty, or the Right to enjoyment of life and liberty, is one of the fundamental or natural Rights, which has been protected by its inclusion as a guarantee in the various constitutions, which is not derived from, or dependent on, the U.S. Constitution, which may not be submitted to a vote and may not depend on the outcome of an election. It is one of the most sacred and valuable Rights, as sacred as the Right to private property…and is regarded as UNALIENABLE.” 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, Sect.202, p.987.
    Lawful,,Due proses is Constitutional the private American side 1866 civil rights act to protect lawful Americans from there Elected and public Employees,,Judicial proses Fraud and treasonous Fraud appone the Court, Constitutional lawfulness court proceeding of a jury of 12, jury nullification,,,, Judicial proses Democracy Courts is the defato of 1871,

    Many of our people seem to believe that their state government
    has jurisdiction to stop the common law Grand Juries. However,
    the state government only has authority over statutory (ie. state)
    law, not common law. The common law of England was used to
    establish the U.S. Constitution, so it existed before it and, thus,
    it is superior to it. The common law is time immemorial.

    The state government did not create the common law, so it has
    no authority to abolish it or control it, unless we allow ourselves
    to be tricked to putting common law under statutory law, where
    it’s “their house, their rules.” However, if we operate outside the
    statutory rules by invoking common law, no state government
    has the authority or jurisdiction to dictate, control or abolish
    what we do. They only have authority to enforce our decisions.

    If the U.S. Supreme Court acknowledged the authority of the
    common law Grand Jury (U.S. v. Williams), why would the
    state have authority to counter that opinion? The common law
    is superior to all statutory law, and we must only invoke it in
    the right way to have superior standing. We need to stop
    putting the common law and the Grand Juries underneath
    their inferior statutory laws. The people (singular AND plural)
    have the ultimate authority!

    Includes all Agency’s and Elected and public employees As well

    By the great weight of authority it is acknowledged that generally “public officials” are not immune from suit when they allegedly violate the civil rights of citizens, and that a “public official’s” defence of immunity is to be sparingly applied in these kinds of cases. James v. Ogilvie, 1970, DC Ill., 310 F. Sup. 661, 663.
    Title 18 241-242

    http://www.occupycorporatism.com/illegal-police-department-activity-threaten-to-bankrupt-counties-nationwide/#sthash.AKDKLuGy.dpbs
    Illegal Police Department Activity Threaten to Bankrupt Counties Nationwide | Susanne Posel
    http://www.occupycorporatism.com
    Local police departments (LPDs) across the nation are incorporated as specialized non-profits. Most LPDs are known to the Secretary of State in their respective state as an association which gives the impression to the average citizen that this is a union. However this is not the case.
    Public Notice. *The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18
    U.S.C. 119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this
    “Message,” including attachments. The originator intended this Message for
    the specified recipients only; it may contain the originator’s confiNo.95-2232.
    Argued Dec. 12, 1995. — February 22, 1996
    Before POSNER, Chief Judge, and ESCHBACH and DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judges.
    “Completing the required training and passing the state test must be done before you can get licensed. The training covers
    business practices and laws that relate to construction contractors. These are not trade related classes. The purpose of
    the training is to (1) help you understand laws and business practices for a contracting business in Oregon and (2) help
    you pass the test.”
    http://ccbed.ccb.state.or.us/WEBpdf/CCB/Publications/providers.pdf
    ccbed.ccb.state.or.usmething about it? Recorded at Eastern State Penitentiary on the Fifth of November, ..
    CC,Other Agency.personal file copy public recorded
    Report FBI Financial Fraud at StopFraud.gov
    As I’m disabled
    1Ors 164.075¹Theft by extortion
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=20RoAfflGCM
    Why Good People Should Be Armed
    http://www.youtube.com
    Without Prejudice All Rights Reserved UCC1-308
    Sovereign Confidentiality Notice:
    I am not an attorney, medical professional or financial adviser and all the exchanges contained in this email are for personal use only. This private email message, including any attachment[s] is limited to the sole use of the intended recipient[s] and may contain Privileged and/or Confidential Information. Any and All Political, Private or Public Entities, Federal, State, or Local Corporate Government[s] , et. al.,and/or Third Party[ies] working in collusion by collecting and/or monitoring My email[s] and collecting these communications Without my Exclusive Permission are Barred from Any and All Unauthorized Review,Use, Disclosure or Distribution. With Explicit Reservation of All My Rights, Without Prejudice and Without Recourse to Me, Any omission does not constitute a waiver of any and/or ALL Intellectual Property Rights & Reserved Rights. It is my hope that the things within this email are a blessing unto every reader without exception, for I desire peaceful co-existence with ALL! dential
    and proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies unintended
    recipients that they have received this Message in error, and strictly
    proscribes their Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
    actions. Recipients-in-error shall notify the originator immediately by
    e-mail, and delete the original message. Authorized carriers of this message
    shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
    v. Arch. Anything stated in this email may be limited in the content and is
    not to be taken out of context.**Wireless Copyright Notice**. Federal and
    State laws govern copyrights to this Message. You must have the
    originator’s full written consent to alter, copy, or use this Message.
    Originator acknowledges others’ copyrighted content in this Message.
    Otherwise, Copyright © 2014 by originator**. All Rights Reserved.

    Without Prejudice All Rights Reserved UCC1-308

  34. Edward Johnston
    THE NEXT PHONE BOMB…SINCE WE GOT EDWARD JOHNSTON OUT OF JAIL…WILL BE AIMED AT NEW YORK…THE STATUTE OF “INTENT” OF HARASSING, ALARMING, ANNOYING OR ALARM A
    POLICE OFFICER IS A CLASS 5 FELONY !!!!! STAY TUNED

    FOR DETAILS….OK. THERE HAS BEEN A BILL INTRODUCED IN NY THAT IF YOU
    “ANNOY” OR “HARASS” A POLICE OFFICER IT IS A FELONY! HERE IS THE PROPOSED BILL: S 240.33 AGGRAVATED HARASSMENT OF A POLICE OFFICER OR PEACE OFFICER.
    A PERSON IS GUILTY OF AGGRAVATED HARASSMENT OF A POLICE OFFICER OR
    PEACE OFFICER WHEN, WITH THE INTENT TO HARASS, ANNOY, THREATEN OR ALARM
    A PERSON WHOM HE OR SHE KNOWS OR REASONABLY SHOULD KNOW TO BE A POLICE
    OFFICER OR PEACE OFFICER ENGAGED IN THE COURSE OF PERFORMING HIS OR HER
    …See More
    S2402-2013 – NY Senate Open Legislation – Establishes the crime of aggravated harassment of a…
    open.nysenate.gov
    Open Legislation comments facilitate discussion of New York State legislation. All comments are subject to moderation. Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity or hate speech; or that links to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are no…
    Like · · Follow Post · Share · 36 · Yesterday at 1:28pm
    Options
    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/05/17/IRS-Chief-Taxes-Are-voluntary

    Outgoing IRS Chief: Taxes Voluntary.
    Outgoing IRS Chief: Taxes Voluntary…. Our system of government Is a voluntary tax system…. What does this say about the US and,…
    http://www.breitbart.com/…/05/17/IRS-Chief-Taxes-Are-Voluntary – Cached.
    Edward Johnston
    Edward Johnston
    I would like to thank you all for saving my life,Laura, Ken,Austin,Lisa,An all my god bless you angels in your education, Learn and educate the children around you, In our responsibility to educate our elected and public employees of there resolvability to of our JES US Constitutional Republic, Commune law of the land, Responsibly to aid legal constitutional republic americans, Read it know it by heart, Understand you have to this, as most quilt the bible, this is your bible quilt it, please in JES US NAME.

    Children can not do this until they our 18yrs old to my understanding ,anyone has more information this please provide so we all can educate one an anther, Help educate DA rob bovett an all our employes , you have sen what your elected and public employees have done to commit piracy of your vessel and children’s bloodline ,, So educate them not to contract with the treaty of 1213,
    http://www.getoutofdebtfree.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=51121&mobile=on
    Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board::EMMA
    emma.msrb.org/EducationCenter/WhatAreBonds.aspx Cached
    Underwriters generally do not retain the bonds but instead market them to investors, who effectively become … buy municipal bonds in … bonds after the end …
    File on there bonds and the privet side commune law.
    http://keystoliberty2.wordpress.com/2012/04/15/uniform-bonding-code-part-2/

    http://universallyaware.ning.com/forum/topics/judge-dale-retired-spilling-the-beans
    https://www.fidelity.com/
    http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2013/02/foreclosure-judge-dale-on-cusip-number-and-foreclosure-2557980.html
    http://lucas2012infos.wordpress.com/2012/05/25/judge-dale-retired-the-great-american-adventure-secrets-of-america-part-1-5-25-may-2012/

    http://guardianlv.com/2013/02/jd-in-the-money-oppts-ucc-filing-explained-what-this-means-for-all-of-us/
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yKmdRwhY6g
    http://dockets.justia.com/docket/oregon/ordce/6:2007cv06302/85536/

    Carl Miller 1 On The Constitution & The Bill Of Rights – YouTube
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wpvEK7iMHdM Cached
    This clip was the first attempt to upload this video. It has now been listed simply as ” Carl Miller 1 Pt.1-11″ it took 11 parts to upload the entire first …
    .Play Video
    Constitutional Violations – Civil Rights Task Force of …
    http://www.civilrightstaskforce.info/…the_constitution.htm
    So much more listen to kenstalkshoe,,
    prescription: 6pm oregontime check in weekdays/..
    Hosted by: kenztalkshoe
    Phone Number: (724) 444-7444
    Call ID: 128461
    listen to the past shows
    Presented to you by.
    title 18 306-9

    http://www.oregontrackers.com
    an All you Angels,,Keep on the path of freedom an the path to garden of Eden,
    Ken Ball
    Austin ThomasKen Ball
    2 hours ago ·
    Over 2,000 calls recieved…thanx everyone…but we have to keep the pressure on !!! CALL DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE ROB…541-265-4145 WE NEED TO FLOOD THE PHONE LINES AND EMAILS Address:
    Lincoln County Sheriff’s Office
    225 West Olive Street, Room 203 Docket: Authority: LINCOLN Next Court:Edward Johnston just got arrested for videotaping police. Call the District Attorney’s office and demand they release Edward with no charges as the Supreme court has already decided on the matter…police can be videotaped. Call 541-265-4145 and ask for Rob’s voicemail. Rob is the DA
    Charge Statute Description Release
    HARASS 166065 HARASSMENT
    INT W POL 162247 INTERFERING WITH A POLICE OFFICER

    Initial Bail = $25,000- Inquire at facility for details
    waiting for video of arrest
    Contents: Mission Statement / Vision Statement; Lincoln County Jail: Facts and … Oregon Sheriff’s Jail Command Council – Jail vs. prison – is there a difference?
    2 Google reviews · Write a review
    251 W Olive St Newport, OR 97365
    (541) 265-4277
    Newport, OR 97365

    Tel: 541-265-4277
    Emergencies: Dial 911
    TTY Relay Service: Dial 711

    Email: LCSheriff@co.lincoln.or.us “Ok in Oregon we have a fellow freedom fighter Edward Johnston in jail …… watch this video and then consider he was arrested shortly after for allegedly assaulting an officer whom he was videoing harassing a neighbor with the idea they had a warrant for her [ Laura Weaver ] This video is EPIC and they never once try to rebut what he says in this county commission meeting.” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6tVMlqBuMdc&feature=youtu.be
    Like · · Unfollow Post · Share · 18 hours ago

    Seen by 1
    Edward Johnston I would like to say Thank you, in Jesus name,,,, Understand jes-us is us JES_US OR JUST US,,you and me we are all Jesus in hes name who made the change in Jesus name,if we are him in likeness see how its going to shine,No It time for personal resolvability and educate our children properly, An the hordes is going to be forgiveness in some cases, but don’t forget your knowledge for the kindness and healing,, no you understand how we got her, no it is to learn how to heal an proper amends,An some may not make that part then we all mind our personal l business,,An learn a helping hand as we would like the same respect,,please educate your children local home school on you knowledge, an http://www.oregontrackers.com,, an all the ons you have made copys of remember make copy’s for the children’s hour,As you keep interacting your self your children will be free. With out your faith none of this would be a reality, Not a Show, Please Call oregon senators and house members and ask them our they going to honor your rights in there state there of oath of office then on state at a time.Our there going to continue piracy, of our vessels and the children to pay fro the sins of others Thru bonds,,Thank you for this education info main,,Meet Your Strawman
    http://www.yourstrawman.com
    Meet Your Strawman Patrick J. Kelly,,,,Call Oregonians media and them if there our commit, rico,and conspire,but be polite at all times, member most don’t get it to you time to see your freedom ,Always be polite and Curtis,show respect and honer so it shall be shown back,Peace and god bless my children,, Teach peace and respect,Grow food in your areas and teach other collect you rain so you all way have back up ,, This dos not taking from other earn your labor way, Study the 10 commandments,,http://www.bible-knowledge.com/10-commandments/,Sabbath day is Saturday..Peace And God bless, East coast meets west to save the united commune law states for America rally.You have the knowledge lets do it right folks,As crazy at it sounds lets seen there sins home,If folks our making amends and being rude give it time to see if they our for real in the souls, Time will tell how we all forgive,If you can heal forgive and let go see the light,Mother will start earth the healing processes,,father will balance things with out judgement only from his or her pairs.,Nature of jes-us, As I believe god gave us the garden of eden,, Our county’s of state,respect they neighbor,we our not in maritime laws stop living like it stop your childish behaviors, not trying to be rude, honor they words with your spouse,stop the gossip for the root of all evil money, look what it has done to our freedom, that’s why some say it cost money for freedom see the point,, honer thy words, once a mans word is his bond. If man would be men and protect there family and stop passing the suffering of the sin tax they may know real love,,Peace and god bless you all in the name of Jes_us, Share your love our soul and spirit.help they neighbor, don’t steal from him or her,,look who our they real bully in you elected and public employes you pay for your commune law protection,Judge Dale (retired) – The Great American Adventure Secrets …
    lucas2012infos.wordpress.com/2012/05/25/judge-dale… Cached
    Judge Dale (retired) – The Great American Adventure Secrets Of America (Part 1 – 5) – 25 May 2012,,Remember your our there employers our they have no job our retirement you on it as the stock holder of your birth certificate,,see the reality,, See what they don’t wont us to know,,legal american under the ,,Ancestry,,14th amendment of 1867 birth certificate,,Maybe you can see my point,that’s like,http://www.yourstrawman.com/,,,Peace and god bless ,, now lets learn how to heal mother earth,an the souls of others,,I wont to go hunting fishing and enjoy my earth around me folks how about you,live life and for those who have found love never for get the happy times and why you feel in love not to be alone and share life with those around you,,
    Oregon Trackers
    http://www.oregontrackers.com
    Historic Bailout Trial – The constitutionality of the robbery of the Treasury of the United States by the criminal Wall Street Bankers hangs in the balance.
    4 minutes ago · Like · Remove Preview
    Write a comment…

    Options
    Ken Ball
    Email: LCSheriff@co.lincoln.or.us “Ok in Oregon we have a fellow freedom fighter Edward Johnston in jail …… watch this video and then consider he was arrested shortly after for allegedly assaulting an officer whom he was videoing harassing a neighbor with the idea they had a warrant for her [ Laura Weaver ] This video is EPIC and they never once try to rebut what he says in this county commission meeting.” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6tVMlqBuMdc&feature=youtu.be
    Ed Johnston Running for Sheriff 06/05/2013
    http://www.youtube.com

  35. Typical mexifornia fruit loop. I didn’t see him put a probe in the water not once. He was measuring the air with his little meter. What would have been nice if the guy fishing had caught a fish and held the meter near it. Or he needed a probe to put in the water, because he did nothing more than sample the air. Let the fruits and flakes eat the fish and swim in the ocean. I don’t care. As a matter of fact get the whole damn state in the ocean and eat the fish. Then mexifornia will become an American state again in stead of what it’s become !!!

  36. There are two sites which have provided a clear insight into this dispute, and neither discounts the severity of the incident in Fukushima. http://www.giegercounter.com has analyzed the samples from Halfmoon Bay for the isotopic signature and the isotopes are Radium and Thorium. http://www.jimstonefreelance.com was former NSA and has also shown what really did go down on 311
    http://www.radiationnetwork.com is a site where individuals uplink their counters for a minute by minute updated report. BTW the network’s readings are in agreement with my own counter.

  37. I am so grateful that we are seeing first hand from someone we are familiar with what exactly is going on with the radiation. So much news is out there and it’s stressful to try and dissect what seems to be true or what seems to be less true. Thank you for doing this and I hope you can get your hands on possible a more advanced instrument or get more expert help! We deserve to know for sure just how bad it is!

  38. Hey there! Brief issue that’s absolutely out subject matter.
    Are you aware of the steps to making a website cellular favorable? My website appearances strange when searching from my phone.
    I’m trying to find a style or wordpress plugin that might be able to handle this concern. Please share if you have any suggestions.
    Thanks a lot.

  39. Which means even if anything were to hit these difficult at highspeed, they’ll
    not crack into your eyes. Remember, youngsters get additional stress
    of finding new text and in addition learn to check wording and
    also other reading abilities.

  40. Ethan whose frequent use of the words bomb and terrorist had gotten both he and Peter booted off their plane tries to make amends by offering him a ride in his rental car to Hollywood (where he hopes to get a role on Two and a Half Men).

  41. Now when the evening commences setting in you’re
    not likely to be capable of only reach around and show on the
    light move. Being able to combine outside growing problems using interior growing situations has resulted in enhanced developing
    conditions and productivity.

  42. I’m not that a lot of a internet reader to be honest but your blogs really good, keep it up! I’ll go ahead and bookmark your web site to come back within the future. All the finest

  43. We like your post, the point that your web site is definitely a tiny bit diverse makes it so fascinating, I actually get fed up of seeing the same outdated tedious recycled stuff almost all of the time.

  44. How could i extend the range on the Wireless N router? I have an Xtreme N handheld router (Dlink). I need to extend the reach from the wireless signal. I discover how to do it for a new G signal. I want to find out how to do them for an N sign. Is it possible make use of regular N routers when repeaters. If so, just how do i configure them. Thanks for the information.

  45. Hello, Neat post. There is an problem along with your internet site in internet explorer, could test this¡K IE still could be the marketplace leader and a huge portion of other people will miss your magnificent writing because of this problem.

  46. 1st, let’s kill off a genuine fabrication: You can not use a reverse cellular phone number lookup for totally totally free anyplace, anytime.

  47. Hey There. I discovered your weblog thhe usage of msn. That is
    a very well written article. I’ll make sure to boikmark iit and
    come back tto read more of your useful information. Thanks for the post.

    I’ll certainly return.

  48. Good day I am sso glad I found your webpage, I really found you
    by accident, while I was searching on Yahoo for something else, Anyhow I am here now and wwould just like to say
    thanks for a incredible post and a all round exciting blog (I also love thee theme/design), I don’t have time to browse
    it all at the minute but I have boojmarked it andd also added
    in your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be baxk to rezd much more, Please
    ddo keep up the excellent job.


Leave a Comment